This course sought to instruct students about the different forms of inquiry and how they have been illustrated by different people over the course of time. The class was broken down into six different modules each describing a different form of inquiry. I had not previously learned about each form of inquiry and found ways to incorporate them into my teaching. Each form of inquiry was given a description using an individual that illustrated and originated the method in education that could be applied to everyday teaching. While each form of inquiry is quite different, there are certain elements of each that can be incorporated into coaching and instructing of young people. 

Administration in Higher Education incorporated the many different elements of administration at the collegiate level. The course highlighted multiple requirements necessary in administration for a University to be successful as well as the levels needed to reach that point. Through the many different facets illustrated by the readings regarding administration, it was clear to me that Higher Education requires a great deal of organization as well as a strong work ethic. Each assignment as well as the course teachings added to my knowledge of not only administration, but also the differences in higher education and teaching young people. While I do not plan on being an administrator at this level, the lessons learned in this course can be applied to my own teaching. 

This course explored skill development in athletes through different coaching methods using the constraints model of motor learning. In order to develop athletic skills through coaching, the course illustrated multiple different approaches to instruction. Rather than citing specific actions required to become a good coach, the readings and lectures made it clear that sport instruction and coaching is a constant process.